[The following is a guest submission for NiagaraHub.com – the content or opinion expressed within does not necessarily reflect the opinion of NiagaraHub. Readers are encouraged to submit articles and videos, but NiagaraHub expresses the right to approve or disapprove each submission. Each submission will be posted as is. Enjoy!]
The study concludes that removal in sections would be the best approach, and that the first section to be removed (as the most environmentally significant) should be that between Findlay Drive and Devil’s Hole (the City line); the study has obviously rejected the notion of removal being only from downtown Niagara Falls to Findlay as without merit. We strongly agree with that.
Further, the study has documented that if the parkway were removed, increased traffic on alternate routes would be insignificant. It also projects potential economic growth for the region, realized as a result of increased visitations and other development, because of the accessibility of the new and remarkable parkland–and that the increase in regional income would be significant. This is where and how environmental restoration and economics are linked.
Two things make the EDR study more reliable, better, than all the other “studies” completed over the last thirty years: 1) this is the first time in history that the entire gorge rim has been considered, studied, and acknowledged as an organic whole, an ecological landscape connected to the natural waterfalls and to the gorge below, and 2) the so-called studies that preceded it were not studies at all, but plans drawn up based on how some individuals thought the gorge rim should appear–with little or no recognition, care, or knowledge of # 1.
But the natural gorge rim should not a be a monopoly set, manipulated according to the political whims of the moment. When a genuine study, therefore, such as the one EDR is providing, demonstrates to us, based on scientific data and other factual information, what should be done, it’s time to set those other schemes aside (and most of the “options” being gathered by State Parks, based on whatever “visions” were thrown into the hat, are among these), and to get to work with cooperative plans for total removal. It is the cleanest, most rational, and most elegant of the options: total removal and the environmental restoration of a natural gorge rim.
[ TWO NOTATIONS: 1) The EDR study is not endorsed 100% by 100% of either the membership of NHP or NFWHC: that may be one of the distinctions between studies and plans. Plans can turn out exactly as planned, studies may result in producing elements that not everyone likes. For those interested in what the objections arising from these groups were, they can be found under Recent Postings at www.niagaraheritage.org 2) Many members of these two groups believe that State Parks is opposed to total removal and will do what they can to prevent it, including the presentation of many “road-retaining” options. Many believe the main reason they oppose total removal is that with a road in place gorge rim maintenance is paid for by the Department of Transportation; with the road gone, we then have a park, the maintenance of which becomes the responsibility of State Parks.]
But make no mistake: the NHP & NFWHC, along with the nearly 80 other groups and organizations listed on the NHP site, do support 100% the total removal of the gorge parkway and the restoration of the natural environment, as has been recommended by the EDR study. We further appreciate NiagaraHub’s providing yet another poll opportunity re whether or not to remove the gorge parkway. Some few of us even voted on it. What the rest have suggested is that the “poll-keepers” visit the NHP site, take note of the 2000+ individuals on the petition in support of removal there…and then punch that poll removal button 2,202 more times. (Keeping in mind that the organizational memberships would add hundreds of thousands more.)
My deep gratitude and thank you to those who, without reward, have offered their support for total removal, who signed the petition, who against all odds have taken a stand, who understand the value of reclaiming our natural environment and heritage for the generations that will follow us.
Bob Baxter